Nvidia Rtx 2080 Vs 2070 Super
Price at present 633$ Games supported 100% Cost at present 748$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics menu architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, simply for precise assessment you lot have to consider their benchmark and gaming examination results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a time to come figurer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards information technology's interface and autobus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of retentivity installed: its type, size, double-decker, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of organisation RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will testify useful if you need some detail technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including item versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark operation comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if yous find some perceived inconsistencies, experience costless to speak upward in comments department, we commonly fix problems quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, xi and 12 (the terminal beingness washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. Information technology used 4 tests based on two scenes, ane being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken send, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm criterion, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Criterion coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX xi criterion for gaming PCs. It features two split tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench five is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Criterion coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX xi feature level 9 to display a boxing between 2 space fleets about a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Benchmark coverage: eight% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte benchmark combined from 11 dissimilar examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Grouping. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench v is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 unlike examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: v% Benchmark coverage: 2% This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya xiii engine to render a superhero energy establish static scene consisting of more than 700 chiliad polygons, in six different modes. Benchmark coverage: two% Criterion coverage: two% Benchmark coverage: 2% This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games. Benchmark coverage: one% Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Item gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the average frames per 2d in a large set of popular games across unlike resolutions: +five.i% −5.one% −half dozen.8% +vi.viii% −three.4% +3.iv% −6.1% +6.one% +21.2% −21.2% +11.nine% −11.9% −2.1% +2.1% +21.7% −21.7% −11.ix% +11.nine% −12.6% +12.half dozen% −7.7% +7.7% +9.5% −nine.v% −2.7% +two.7% +3.iv% −3.four% −half dozen.8% +vi.8% −6.8% +six.viii% −10.8% +10.8% +18.two% −eighteen.2% +10.v% −10.five% −1.one% +one.ane% +21.one% −21.1% −12.three% +12.3% −19.5% +19.5% −6.9% +vi.9% −14.ix% +14.9% +2.vi% −2.half dozen% −9.6% +9.6% −iii.one% +three.1% −4.six% +4.6% −half-dozen.1% +6.1% −37.9% +37.9% +9.1% −9.one% +2.viii% −ii.8% −six.nine% +6.9% +15% −15% −xi.two% +eleven.2% −10.three% +ten.3% −xv.8% +15.8% −13.9% +13.nine% −19% +19% −14.5% +14.five% −15.9% +15.9% −12.two% +12.2% −one.8% +i.8% −seven.5% +vii.v% −30.1% +30.1% −40.4% +40.4% −7.5% +7.v% −four.7% +4.7% +6.8% −6.8% −eleven.8% +eleven.8% −18.2% +18.ii% −16.iv% +sixteen.four% −18.ix% +18.9% −11.1% +xi.1% −17.9% +17.9% −11.4% +xi.4% −17.9% +17.ix% −v.1% +5.1% −12.five% +12.five% −28.3% +28.3% −200% +200% −13% +13% −12.v% +12.5% +3.7% −three.7% −17.ii% +17.2% Technical City couldn't make up one's mind between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super The differences in performance seem too small. Should you notwithstanding take questions apropos choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and we shall reply. Do y'all call back we are right or mistaken in our option? Vote by clicking "Like" button about your favorite graphics card. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 Super from AMD is Radeon RX 6700, which is slower by 1% and lower by 1 position in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2070 Super: Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Super from AMD is Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is slower by one% and lower by 4 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Super: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Hither you can come across the user rating of the graphics cards, also equally rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a calibration of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of ane to 5: Here you lot can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2070 Super vs RTX 2080 Super
General info
Place in performance rating 38 24 Value for money 32.95 29.43 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU code name Turing TU104 Turing TU104 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release appointment 2 July 2019 (3 years agone) two July 2019 (3 years ago) Launch toll (MSRP) $499 $699 Current price $633 (1.3x MSRP) $748 (1.1x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 3072 Core clock speed 1605 MHz 1650 MHz Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1815 MHz Number of transistors 13,600 1000000 13,600 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm Thermal pattern ability (TDP) 215 Watt 250 Watt Texture fill rate 283.ii 348.5 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 267 mm 267 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pivot + 1x eight-pin 1x six-pin + 1x 8-pin Memory
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 8 GB eight GB Memory bus width 256 Chip 256 Bit Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 15500 MHz Retentiveness bandwidth 448.0 GB/south 495.9 GB/south Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C HDMI + + G-SYNC back up + + Technologies
API support
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_1) Shader Model half dozen.5 vi.5 OpenGL four.6 4.half-dozen OpenCL 1.2 one.two Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131 CUDA 7.v 7.v Benchmark performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
Total HD 138 142 1440p 92 100 4K 64 73
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 104 99 Assassinator'south Creed Valhalla 88 94 Battlefield 5 118 122 Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 180 191 Cyberpunk 2077 80 65−seventy Far Cry 5 122 109 Far Cry New Dawn 96 98 Forza Horizon 4 174 143 Hitman 3 176 197 Horizon Zero Dawn 111 125 Red Dead Redemption 2 117 126 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127 116 Watch Dogs: Legion 111 114
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90 87 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 74 79 Battlefield v 103 110 Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 139 154 Cyberpunk 2077 78 65−70 Far Cry 5 116 105 Far Cry New Dawn 94 95 Forza Horizon iv 172 142 Hitman three 154 173 Horizon Zip Dawn 87 104 Metro Exodus 87 93 Ruby Dead Redemption 2 67 77 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118 115 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 178 195 Spotter Dogs: Legion 96 99
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65 68 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 66 70 Battlefield 5 95 131 Cyberpunk 2077 72 65−lxx Far Weep 5 109 106 Far Cry New Dawn 87 93 Forza Horizon four 153 133 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 109 Scout Dogs: Legion 68 75
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95 110 Hitman 3 101 115 Horizon Zip Dawn 63 75 Metro Exodus 55 63 Ruby Dead Redemption 2 44 51 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82 92
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 57 58 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53 57 Battleground 5 83 108 Cyberpunk 2077 47 65−70 Far Weep 5 93 100 Far Cry New Dawn 86 90 Forza Horizon 4 125 117 Spotter Dogs: Legion 51 57
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55 65 Hitman three 55 64 Horizon Zero Dawn 37 44 Metro Exodus 36 xl Red Dead Redemption 2 28 33 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44 49 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 67 79
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 39 41 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32 36 Battleground five 53 68 Cyberpunk 2077 22 65−lxx Far Cry 5 54 61 Far Cry New Dawn 56 63 Forza Horizon four 84 81 Lookout man Dogs: Legion 29 34 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 61.45 65.92 Cost $499 $699 Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 3072 Memory bandwidth 448 495.9 Thermal design power (TDP) 215 Watt 250 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2070 Super past AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Super past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2070-Super-vs-GeForce-RTX-2080-Super
0 Response to "Nvidia Rtx 2080 Vs 2070 Super"
Post a Comment